Super User

Super User

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

Half of Ukrainians back compromise to end war – poll

Half of Ukrainians now favor a compromise to end the conflict with Russia through peace negotiations involving international mediators, a recent survey by Ukrainian pollster Socis has suggested.

According to a report by Ukrainskaya Pravda on Monday, the latest survey, conducted in December 2024, reflects shifting public sentiment in Ukraine, with increasing support for a diplomatic solution after years of conflict and the depleting situation on the battlefield.

According to the poll, 50.6% of respondents support negotiations involving international leaders to secure guarantees for ending the conflict. This marks a significant increase from 36.1% in February 2024.

The percentage of Ukrainians who back continuing the fight until Ukraine regains its 1991 borders, has significantly dropped from 33.5% in February 2024 to 14.7% in December 2024.

The survey also indicated that support for suspending hostilities and freezing the conflict along the current front lines has more than doubled over the year, from 8.2% to 19.5%.

According to the Socis poll, the percentage of Ukrainians advocating the restoration of borders as of February 2022 has remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 8.6% and 13.2% throughout the year.

The Ukrainskaya Pravda report emphasized that “one of the greatest challenges in the negotiation process” will be securing the support of both the Ukrainian public and the military for the decisions of the country’s leadership.

The outlet also cited an unnamed “influential”member of Vladimir Zelensky’s team, who stated that one major priority is securing “some kind of agreement on guarantees with the US, which would be ratified by Congress.” Another key task, according to the official, is resisting Russian demands for Ukraine’s neutrality.

Zelensky stated earlier that at least 200,000 “European peacekeepers”would be needed to uphold a ceasefire.

Moscow has dismissed the idea of Western peacekeepers in Ukraine, which has come to the fore in recent weeks following US President Donald Trump’s pledge to pursue a swift resolution to the conflict. Since his inauguration last week, Trump has called on Moscow to strike a deal with Kiev or face new sanctions, but maintained that he is “not looking to hurt Russia.” Trump has reportedly given his new Ukraine envoy, Keith Kellogg, 100 days to finalize a settlement. According to the Kremlin, however, it has so far received no specific proposals from Washington.

Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine broke down in the spring of 2022, with both sides accusing each other of making unrealistic demands. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Ukraine must become a neutral country and renounce claims to new Russian regions for any peace talks to succeed.

Moscow has since repeatedly voiced readiness to resume talks, firmly rejecting the idea of a temporary freeze to the conflict, which it says would only help Ukraine to rearm.

Kiev must give up its ambitions to join NATO, demilitarize, denazify, and abandon plans to obtain nuclear weapons, Moscow has insisted.

 

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Ukraine replaces commander of eastern front after Russia captures another town

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy replaced the commander of the eastern front, the most heated battlefield of the Ukraine war, after Russian forces captured another strategic town there.

Brigadier-General Andriy Hnatov was replaced as the battlefield commander in the east by Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi, overall commander of ground forces, who will keep his previous duties. Hnatov was given a role overseeing training and communications.

In his nightly video address late on Sunday, Zelenskiy said the aim was to strengthen the command of troops in the Donetsk region. Donetsk, a battlefield since 2014 and one of four provinces Russia claims to have annexed since its 2022 full-scale invasion, has been the main focus of fighting for more than a year.

The Ukrainian military confirmed on Monday that it had withdrawn from the Donetsk region town of Velyka Novosilka, a day after Russia said it had captured it. Viktor Trehubov, a military spokesperson for Ukraine's eastern front, confirmed that Russian troops had entered the town but said fighting continued on the outskirts.

Russian forces have been slowly but steadily advancing in eastern Ukraine for more than a year in relentless ground combat that has caused massive military losses on both sides. Kyiv, for its part, has managed to capture and hold a pocket of territory inside Russia over the past six months.

The new eastern commander, Drapatyi, 42, is well respected in the army, where he is credited with stopping a Russian offensive in the northeastern Kharkiv region last year.

Ukrainian forces halted Russia's initial assault on the capital Kyiv after Russia's invasion in 2022 and achieved several big successes recapturing territory during the first year of the war. But they have largely been on the defensive since the failure of a major counterattack in mid-2023.

Ukrainian analysts estimate Russia captured about 3,000 square km (1200 square miles) of territory last year.

With the war approaching its three-year mark in February, Ukraine is outmanned on the battlefield and its troops are exhausted.

The government tried to address the issue by lowering the mobilisation age to 25 from 27 and introducing tougher rules for those evading the call-up. But it has so far resisted lowering the mobilisation age further to boost manpower.

Trehubov, the eastern forces spokesperson, said that the logistics hub of Pokrovsk in the Donetsk region remained the main Russian target. Around 7,000 people are believed to remain inside Pokrovsk, which had around 60,000 residents before the invasion.

"The Pokrovsk direction accounts for at least half of all combat clashes, there is a lot of fighting there. It is the most active direction," Trehubov told Ukrainian TV. "They are trying to bypass the city, cut the supply lines and drive our troops out of the city."

 

RT/Reuters

Throughout history, men have been under immense societal pressure to produce male heirs to carry on their names and legacies. This expectation has often led to strife, stress, and sometimes untoward actions. The preference for male heirs is deeply rooted in many societies, possibly stemming from the belief in male superiority.

Historically, patriarchal families believed that women were economically dependent on men and thus became their subjects as daughters married, lived in their husbands’ homes, and did not carry the responsibility of caring for their parents. Despite these societal norms, women have shown remarkable resilience, often challenging these beliefs and carving their paths in the face of reinforced societal norms and laws favouring men. This resilience is a source of inspiration and hope for a more equitable future.

Rural families with no sons were looked down upon. Sons were expected to carry on the family lineage, increase the family’s reputation, and protect the family’s interests. The lack of sons was a sign of humiliation and a curse. In some cultures, historical records document the practice of female infanticide. The Arabs, before the advent of Prophet Muhammad (SAW), were notorious for killing their female daughters.

In traditional Chinese society, the need to continue the family line, the assumption that sons have greater earning capacity, and the belief that men would care for the parents in old age conspired to make sons preferred over daughters.

In Hinduism, the desire for male children is every woman’s aspiration and is linked to their spirituality. It also reflects Bhuti’s intense longing for offspring, prompting him to undertake rigorous austerities.

Yet despite all this fixation on the male child, history has shown us that, in many instances, it was the female children who kept the names of their fathers or husbands alive long after they might have departed this world.

Many people know of Marie Curie, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the only woman to win it twice because she discovered radium and polonium, and Mother Theresa, known for her commitment to helping the poor, sick, abandoned, and dying. These women, along with others like Cleopatra, the last Pharaoh of Egypt, and Rosa Parks, who raised the consciousness of not only Black Americans but that of all people to the evils of racism, have left an indelible mark on society. Their achievements are not just a testament to the potential and power of women but a reason for all of us to take pride in their contributions, which have significantly shaped our world and influenced societal norms.

Known for her famous quote, “I was taught that the road to progress was neither quick nor easy”, Marie Curie was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the first person to receive it twice (in Physics in 1903 and Chemistry in 1911). She is still the only scientist to have won the Nobel Prize twice.

Cleopatra (69 BC—30 BC) was an educated, cultured polyglot and shrewd ruler who achieved great political success by signing alliances with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, the most influential leaders of the time.

In 1955, Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her seat to a white passenger on a bus and that contributed to the end of racial segregation. She became a symbol of the fight against racism in the United States and was recognised as the founder of the civil rights movement due to her fight for equality. 

History will never forget Benazir Bhutto, the first elected female Muslim prime minister of an Islamic country, whose murder in 2007 shocked the world. Born to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, a Pakistani lawyer, politician, and statesman who served as the fourth president of Pakistan and later its ninth prime minister, she was one of four children consisting of two boys who kept her father’s name on the front burner.

What of Diana, Princess of Wales, arguably the most popular royalty in contemporary times? Born Diana Frances Spencer, she was a member of the British royal family, the first wife of King Charles III, and the mother of Princes William and Harry. By the time she died in 1997 at 36, her activism and glamour had made her an international icon, earning her enduring popularity.

Many women have extended their fathers’ legacies beyond what their male siblings could do or their husbands’ names beyond what sons could achieve. Such women are found in all aspects of human endeavour, from science to literature to politics. Their diverse and impactful achievements are a potent reminder and a reason to take pride in their contributions to history. Without a doubt, they have significantly shaped our world.

These women, who faced the challenge of maintaining their own identity in a patriarchal society, have shown remarkable strength and resilience in preserving and extending their fathers' and husbands' legacies. They have not just been passive recipients of these legacies but active contributors, shaping and expanding them in their own right.

Jacqueline Lee (Jackie) Kennedy Onassis is worthy of mention. An American writer, book editor, and socialite, she was named after her father, John Vernou “Black Jack” Bouvier III, a Wall Street stockbroker.

Even after her death, she remained one of the most popular and recognisable first ladies in American history. In 1999, she made the list of Gallup’s Most-Admired Men and Women of the 20th century, and surveys of historians conducted periodically by the Siena College Research Institute consistently ranked her among the most highly regarded American first ladies since 1982.

She later became known in the business world when she married her second husband, Aristotle Onassis, a Greek shipping magnate in 1968, who amassed the world’s largest privately-owned shipping fleet and was one of the world’s richest. She outlived both men and bore their names with dignity to her grave.

Then, here we have Dame Bianca Onoh-Ojukwu. Bianca Odinakachukwu Olivia Odumegwu-Ojukwu is a Nigerian politician, diplomat, lawyer, businesswoman, and beauty pageant winner. She has won multiple international pageant titles, including Most Beautiful Girl in Nigeria, Miss Africa, and Miss Intercontinental. She is the daughter of Chief Christian Chukwuma Onoh, better known as CC Onoh, a former Governor of Anambra State. She later married Chief Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, including protestations from her father.

You can search in vain for Onoh’s or Ojukwu’s sons who have achieved close to what their daughter or wife, respectively, have achieved.

Or Hadiza Bala Usman. Which other children of the respected, erudite, intellectually acclaimed Pan-Africanist professor of history do you know of?

Therefore, it is often not sons but daughters and wives that keep men's memories fresh in a world that is quick to forget.

** Hassan Gimba is the CEO/Publisher of Neptune Prime.

Suri Nuthalapati

Key Takeaways

  • Reliable data is the cornerstone of successful AI-driven decision-making and innovation.
  • Data governance, modern architectures and automation ensure data quality and reliability for AI.
  • AI-powered insights depend on breaking silos, mitigating bias and prioritizing data ethics.

As AI transforms various industries, its effectiveness hinges on a single, vital factor: reliable data. Without a solid data foundation, even the most sophisticated AI systems can struggle to deliver results.

Data is the lifeblood of AI. Machine learning models, predictive analytics and other AI-driven tools rely on accurate, timely and relevant data to function effectively. Poor-quality data can lead to biased results, inaccurate predictions, and costly decisions. A recent study by Gartnershows that poor data quality costs organizations an average of $12.9 million annually.

To harness the true potential of AI, businesses must make data reliability a priority by ensuring:

  • Accuracy: Data must be error-free and validated.
  • Completeness: Gaps in data can compromise model outputs.
  • Consistency: Data should follow uniform standards across systems.
  • Timeliness: Insights lose value if data is outdated.
  • Relevance: Only data aligned with business objectives should be utilized.

How to build a strong data foundation

1. Implement robust data governance

Data governance ensures that data is well-managed throughout its lifecycle. Establishing clear policies for data ownership, access and usage mitigates risks and fosters accountability.

Key steps:

  • Appoint a Chief Data Officer to lead all data governance initiatives.
  • Define data quality metrics and monitor adherence.
  • Regularly audit and cleanse data repositories.

2. Leverage modern data architectures

Legacy systems often hinder data integrationand scalability. Adopting modern architectures like data lakehouses enables businesses to unify structured and unstructured data, making it AI-ready.

Benefits include:

  • Improved scalability and performance.
  • Simplified data sharing across departments.
  • Enhanced support for real-time analytics.

3. Utilize automated data pipelines

Manual processes for data collection and transformation are prone to errors and inefficiencies. Automated pipelines streamline these workflows, ensuring consistent and reliable data flow.

Consider solutions such as automated orchestration platforms and cloud-native services for efficient data handling and integration.

4. Embed data quality assurance

Integrating quality assurance mechanisms into your data processes reduces the risk of errorsand inconsistencies. This can include real-time validation, deduplication and anomaly detection.

5. Foster a data-driven culture

Building a culture where data is valued across all levels of the organization is critical. Encourage employees to adopt data-driven decision-making by providing training and making insights accessible.

Turning trusted data into actionable insights

Establishing a strong data foundation is the first step in turning trusted data into actionable insights. This foundation enables businesses to leverage AI for a competitive advantage. AI models can analyze historical data to forecast future trends, allowing retailers to predict inventory needs during seasonal spikes and financial institutions to anticipate potential credit risks.

Additionally, AI facilitates highly personalized customer experiences by examining data on customer preferences, behaviors and purchase histories. This ultimately enhances customer loyalty and increases lifetime value.

AI-driven automation streamlines repetitive tasks like data entry and invoice processing, freeing up resources for more strategic initiatives. Finally, AI tools can identify anomalies and potential risks in real-time, strengthening security and compliance efforts within organizations.

Overcoming challenges

While the benefits of AI and Trusted data are immense, businesses must navigate challenges such as:

  • Data Silos: Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to break down barriers.
  • Bias in AI Models: Regularly audit algorithms to identify and mitigate bias.
  • Privacy Concerns: Adhere to regulations like GDPR and CCPA to ensure data privacy and ethical usage.

The AI era presents transformative opportunities for businesses, but only those with a foundation of reliable data can fully capitalize on its potential. By investing in robust data governance, modern architectures and data-driven culture, businesses can unlock actionable insights that fuel innovation and resilience. As we move deeper into this era of AI, the mantra for success is clear: Reliable data leads to reliable insights.

 

Entrepreneur

The ongoing debate over the Value Added Tax (VAT) sharing formula in Nigeria highlights deep-seated tensions between equity, justice, and national integration. The current system, which redistributes VAT revenue disproportionately, has sparked significant controversy, particularly between states that contribute heavily to the VAT pool and those that benefit more from redistribution. The proposals by President Bola Tinubu and the Nigeria Governors' Forum (NGF) reflect differing priorities, with Tinubu emphasizing derivation (60%) and the NGF advocating for equality (50%). To address these issues, a balanced VAT sharing formula must prioritize national integration while ensuring equity and justice.

Key Issues in the Current VAT System

1. Disproportionate Contributions vs. Allocations:

   - Lagos and Rivers states are the largest contributors to the VAT pool, generating N2.75 trillion and N832 billion, respectively, in 2024. However, they received only 16.7% and 22.4% of their contributions in return.

   - In contrast, states like Katsina, Kano, and Abia received significantly more than they contributed. For instance, Abia contributed N8.68 billion but received N63.78 billion—a 734.8% return.

   - This disparity is particularly pronounced between the southern and northern regions. Southern states contributed N4.28 trillion but received only 40.5% of their contributions, while northern states contributed N540.31 billion but received 258.2% of their contributions.

2. Regional Imbalances:

   - The south-west and south-south regions, driven by economic hubs like Lagos and Rivers, contributed the most to the VAT pool but received far less in return.

   - The north-west, north-east, and north-central regions, despite contributing significantly less, received disproportionately higher allocations. For example, the north-west contributed N211.27 billion but received N574.32 billion—a 271.8% return.

3. Economic and Social Implications:

   - The current system discourages economic productivity in high-contributing states, as they receive minimal returns on their contributions.

   - It also creates dependency in low-contributing states, potentially stifling efforts to improve local revenue generation and economic development.

Principles for a Fair VAT Sharing Formula

To address these issues, the VAT sharing formula should be guided by the principles of equity, justice, and national integration. National integration, in particular, emphasizes supporting weaker members of the federation while ensuring fairness.

1. Equity:

   - Equity requires that states receive a fair return on their contributions to the VAT pool. High-contributing states like Lagos and Rivers should receive a larger share of the revenue they generate, as this incentivizes economic productivity and rewards effort.

   - However, equity does not mean absolute equality. It acknowledges the varying capacities of states and seeks to balance contributions with allocations.

2. Justice:

   - Justice demands that the VAT system does not perpetuate systemic inequalities. States with lower economic output should not be penalized, but they should also not rely excessively on redistribution at the expense of high-contributing states.

   - A just system would ensure that all states have the resources needed to provide basic services and promote development, without creating disincentives for economic growth.

3. National Integration:

   - National integration requires a VAT sharing formula that supports weaker states while fostering unity and cohesion. This means redistributing some revenue to less economically viable states to ensure they can meet their developmental needs.

   - However, this redistribution should not be so excessive that it undermines the economic viability of high-contributing states or creates resentment.

Proposed VAT Sharing Formula

A balanced VAT sharing formula should incorporate elements of both the NGF and Tinubu proposals, with adjustments to ensure equity, justice, and national integration. The following formula is recommended:

- 40% based on derivation: This ensures that states receive a fair return on their contributions, incentivizing economic productivity and rewarding effort.

- 40% based on equality: This promotes national integration by redistributing revenue to weaker states, ensuring they have the resources needed for development.

- 20% based on population: This addresses the needs of states with larger populations, which often require more resources to provide basic services.

Rationale for the Proposed Formula

1. Derivation (40%):

   - Allocating 40% based on derivation strikes a balance between rewarding high-contributing states and ensuring they are not overly disadvantaged. This is a compromise between Tinubu's 60% and the NGF's 30%.

2. Equality (40%):

   - Allocating 40% based on equality ensures that weaker states receive adequate support, promoting national integration and reducing regional disparities. This is higher than Tinubu's 20% but lower than the NGF's 50%.

3. Population (20%):

   - Allocating 20% based on population ensures that states with larger populations receive the resources needed to provide services. This aligns with both proposals and addresses the needs of densely populated states.

Conclusion

The VAT sharing formula in Nigeria must balance the competing principles of equity, justice, and national integration. While high-contributing states like Lagos and Rivers deserve a fair return on their contributions, weaker states also require support to ensure balanced development and national cohesion. The proposed formula—40% derivation, 40% equality, and 20% population—offers a pragmatic solution that addresses these concerns. By adopting this formula, Nigeria can promote economic productivity, reduce regional disparities, and foster national unity.

A significant shift is occurring in Nigeria's petroleum market as imported fuel becomes more cost-effective than domestically refined products from the Dangote Petroleum Refinery. According to recent data, the landing cost of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, has dropped to N922.65 per litre, undercutting Dangote's gantry price of N955 per litre by N32.35.

This price differential could prompt oil marketers to return to importing fuel, despite recent efforts to promote domestic refining. The landing cost includes various expenses such as shipping, import duties, and current exchange rates, which are calculated at N1,550 per dollar.

Market analysts note that this development presents an attractive opportunity for private depot owners and independent marketers. "The lower cost of imported petrol is often an incentive to dealers," explained a major marketer who requested anonymity due to lack of authorization to speak on the matter.

Recent Market Activity

Data from the Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria shows:

- Current on-spot estimated import parity: N922.65 per litre

- 30-day average cost: N939.52 per litre (up from N929.07)

- Brent crude price: $78.29 per barrel (down from $78.88)

Despite the lower landing costs, retail prices remain elevated, with major marketers in the Federal Capital Territory selling between N990 and N1,010 per litre.

Depot Price Variations

Last week saw notable price adjustments across various depots:

- Nipco: N970 per litre

- Aiteo and Sahara: N960 per litre

- Swift: Reduced from N970 to N960

- Wosbab and AA Rano: N960 per litre

- Port Harcourt's Bulk Strategic Depot: Decreased from N1,005 to N981

- Delta and Calabar depots: Maintained prices between N972 and N990

Recent Import Activity

Port data reveals significant import activity, with oil marketers bringing in 57,301 metric tonnes of fuel (approximately 76.84 million litres) between January 21-22, 2025. Two vessels berthed at Lagos ports:

- Apapa Port: 20,400 metric tonnes

- Tincan Port: 36,901 metric tonnes

Additionally, two vessels of undocumented capacity arrived at the Dangote terminal in Lekki Deep Seaport.

Industry Perspectives

The import situation has sparked debate among industry stakeholders. Billy Gillis-Harry, National President of the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria, expressed surprise at the continued imports, citing an informal agreement to pause imports for 180 days to assess Dangote refinery's production capacity.

However, Chinedu Ukadike, National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, clarified that the non-import directive was merely a "mutual understanding" rather than a binding agreement. He emphasized that the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority should permit imports that offer more competitive prices.

The current market dynamics highlight the ongoing challenges in Nigeria's petroleum sector, particularly the impact of exchange rates and global market fluctuations on domestic fuel prices. As the industry continues to evolve, the competition between imported and locally refined products may significantly influence future market trends and pricing strategies.

Suspected Islamist militants killed at least 20 Nigerian soldiers, including a commanding officer, during a brazen assault on an army base in northeastern Borno state, security sources and residents reported on Sunday. The attack, carried out by members of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), targeted the Nigerian Army’s 149 Battalion in Malam-Fatori, a remote town near the border with Niger.

According to survivors, the militants arrived in gun trucks on Friday and launched a surprise attack, overwhelming the troops after more than three hours of intense fighting. "They rained bullets everywhere," said one soldier who survived the assault. "We tried to repel the attack, but they overpowered us, killing our commanding officer, a lieutenant colonel." The soldier, who requested anonymity, confirmed that 20 soldiers died and several others were injured.

Residents reported that the militants remained in the town as late as Saturday night, burning buildings and forcing civilians to flee. Malakaka Bukar, a local militia member assisting the army, said the insurgents also preached to some residents before retreating.

Boko Haram and ISWAP, both active in Borno state, have intensified attacks in the region since the beginning of the year, targeting security forces and civilians alike. Despite being weakened by military operations and internal conflicts, the groups continue to pose a significant threat, displacing thousands and causing widespread devastation.

Trump says Jordan, Egypt should take in Palestinians from Gaza; Egypt and Jordan push back

U.S. President Donald Trump said Jordan and Egypt should take in Palestinians from war-ravaged Gaza, a suggestion rejected by Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that runs the enclave, and apparently rebuffed by Jordan and Egypt.

Asked if this was a temporary or long-term solution for Gaza, where Israel's military assault has caused a dire humanitarian situation and killed tens of thousands, Trump said on Saturday: "Could be either."

Jordan is already home to several million Palestinians, while tens of thousands live in Egypt. Both countries and other Arab nations reject the idea of Palestinians in Gaza being moved to their countries. Gaza is land that Palestinians would want as part of a future Palestinian state.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has repeatedly called for the return of Jewish settlers to Gaza, welcomed Trump's call as "an excellent idea" and said he would work to develop a plan to implement it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected such notions, advocated by Smotrich.

A Hamas official echoed long-standing Palestinian fears about being driven permanently from their homes.

Palestinians "will not accept any offers or solutions, even if (such offers) appear to have good intentions under the guise of reconstruction, as announced in the proposals of U.S. President Trump," Basem Naim, a member of the Hamas political bureau, told Reuters.

Another Hamas official, Sami Abu Zuhri, urged Trump not to repeat "failed" ideas tried by his predecessor Joe Biden.

"The people of Gaza have endured death and refused to leave their homeland and they will not leave it regardless of any other reasons," Abu Zuhri told Reuters.

Jordan also appeared to reject Trump's suggestion, with its Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi telling reporters that the country's stance against any displacement of Palestinians from Gaza remains "firm and unwavering".

Egypt's foreign ministry followed suit, saying it categorically rejects any displacement of Palestinians from their land, be it "short term or long term".

Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Trump's remarks. "Our people will remain steadfast and will not leave their homeland," said a statement published by the official Palestinian news agency WAFA.

Palestinian analyst Ghassan al-Khatib said Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, as well as the Jordanians and Egyptians, would reject Trump's plan: "I don't think that there is a place in reality for such an idea."

'IT'S A REAL MESS'

Referring to a call he had on Saturday with Jordan's King Abdullah, Trump told reporters: "I said to him I'd love you to take on more because I'm looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it's a real mess. I'd like him to take people."

He added, "I'd like Egypt to take people," and said he would speak to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi on Sunday.

"You’re talking about a million and half people, and we just clean out that whole thing," Trump said.

The population in the Palestinian enclave prior to the start of the Israel-Gaza war was around 2.3 million.

Washington had said last year it opposed the forcible displacement of Palestinians. Rights groups and humanitarian agencies have for months raised concerns over the situation in Gaza, with the war displacing nearly the entire population and leading to a hunger crisis.

Washington has also faced criticism for backing Israel but has maintained support for its ally, saying it is helping Israel defend itself against Iranian-backed militant groups like Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.

"It's literally a demolition site, almost everything is demolished and people are dying there, so I'd rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change," Trump said on Saturday.

'NEW AND BETTER LIVES'

Smotrich, who said only "out-of-the-box thinking" could achieve peace, said Trump's plan would give Palestinians "the opportunity to build new and better lives elsewhere".

"With God's help, I will work with the prime minister and cabinet to develop an operational plan to implement this as soon as possible," he said.

In a post on X, Francesca Albanese, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said: "Ethnic cleansing is anything but an 'out-of-the-box' thinking, no matter how one packages it. It is illegal, immoral and irresponsible."

Most of Gaza's population has been internally displaced by the war. On Sunday, many of them rejected Trump's suggestion.

"If he thinks he will forcibly displace the Palestinian people (then) this is impossible, impossible, impossible. The Palestinian people firmly believe that this land is theirs, this soil is their soil," said Magdy Seidam.

"No matter how much Israel tries to destroy, break, and to show people that it had won, in reality it did not win."

The current Gaza conflict was triggered on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking around 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

Israel's subsequent military assault on Gaza has killed more than 47,000 people, according to the Gaza health ministry. The fighting has currently paused amid a fragile ceasefire.

 

Reuters

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

Zelensky explains ban on talks with Moscow

Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky has explained that he banned negotiations with Russia in order to prevent what he called “separatist” talks outside official government oversight. Russia tried to reach out to Kiev through various intermediaries, including Ukrainian lawmakers, European parliamentarians, US contacts, and even ordinary people, he claimed in comments to journalists on Saturday.

Speaking at a press conference with Moldovan President Maia Sandu, Zelensky complained that Moscow started “setting up a large number of various channels” it could use for talks after the start of its military campaign against Kiev in February 2022.

“There were a lot of negotiation processes, many shadowy political corridors,” he added.

“There were many various negotiation venues. I just realized that we and our relevant authorities cannot control it,” he told journalists, adding that he “quickly stopped” it, calling any talks with Moscow outside of his government’s control “separatism.” He also admitted that Russia did have “a large number” of negotiation channels in Ukraine prior to the ban.

Zelensky signed a decree banning any talks with Russia on October 4, 2022. The document only stated that any negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin were “impossible.” It did not specify whether Zelensky or anyone else could still speak with the Russian leadership.

Russia has consistently stated its readiness for peace talks and has accused Kiev of avoiding seeking a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing conflict.

Earlier this week, Putin told Russian journalist Pavel Zarubin that any negotiations between Moscow and Kiev would be “illegitimate” as long as the ban stays in place. Any results of such talks could easily be made null and void, the Russian president warned, adding that, although some preliminary contacts could be made right now, any “serious” steps are not possible until the situation changes.

Putin also called on Kiev’s Western backers to exert pressure on Ukraine and make it lift the prohibition on talks. The Russian president said he believed Kiev was in no rush to lift the ban since it was satisfied with the current situation that allowed it to receive “hundreds of billions [of dollars] from its sponsors” that it can “chomp down on.”

 

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Zelenskiy again replaces commander of Ukraine's key eastern front

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Sunday replaced for the third time in under a year the commander of a key Ukrainian military formation responsible for defending the eastern hub of Pokrovsk that's under increased risk of falling to Russian forces.

Zelenskiy, in his nightly video address, said he put Ukraine's new commander of ground forces, Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi, in charge of the Khortytsia operational-strategic group, whose area of responsibility includes much of Ukraine's eastern front.

"These are the toughest areas of fighting," Zelenskiy said, adding that he had discussed the changes at meeting with Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi.

Russia's capture of the city would bring it closer to seizing the entire Donetsk region, which has been one of President Vladimir Putin's key goals in his war in Ukraine.

Zelensky added that Drapatyi's appointment will help to combine the combat work of the army with the proper training of brigades.

"It is the front-line needs that should determine the standards for staffing and training of brigades," he said.

Drapatyi will replace Major General Andriy Hnatov, who has been in charge of Khortytsia since June and who will become a Deputy Chief of the General Staff to run training and communication.

Russian forces have been steadily advancing in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region towards Pokrovsk, bypassing it from the south and trying to cut off supply routes to Ukraine's troops.

Pokrovsk, which had a pre-war population of around 60,000, has been one of Ukraine's main defensive strongholds in the Donetsk region and the focus of fierce fighting for months.

 

RT/Reuters

Depending on what view one takes of the matter, 10 February promises to be Proxy Wars Day at the Supreme Court of Nigeria in Abuja. On that day, a panel of five Justices of the Supreme Court will take arguments on seven appeals connected with the synthetic political crisis in Rivers State.

The issues that the court will be asked to decide include the validity of last October’s local government elections in the state; the fate of the faction in the Rivers State House of Assembly, who claim to have switched their affiliation from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP, on whose platform they were elected) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC); the legality of the state’s 2025 budget passed by the rump of the state House of Assembly; and the effort to importune judges into denying Rivers State access to its share of the Federation Account.

The effort to frame these as legal issues is transparently valiant. Despite the shameful conversion of judges into politicians in the Rivers State crisis – or indeed because of precisely that fact – the imminence of Rivers State Proxy Wars Day at the Supreme Court is evidence of what has gone wrong with Nigeria’s judicial system and why fixing it is essential for the health of Nigeria’s attempt at government with electoral legitimacy.

This is not the first time that legal disputes about power and how to share the spoils from it have ended up at the highest court in the land. That tendency in Nigeria is over a century old and arguably goes back to the 1921 judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the case of Amodu Tijani, over the effort by the colonial authorities to split Herbert Heelas Macaulay from his support for Eshugbayi Eleko, the Oba of Lagos.

For the hearing of that cases before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in 1920, Macaulay travelled to London with the Oba’s Staff of Office in support of Amodu Tijani and the Idejo Chiefs of Lagos. From London, he issued a statement claiming that the Eleko was the King of over 17 million Nigerians and in possession of a territory more than three times that of Great Britain. Despite a healthy revenue of over £4 million, he claimed, the British had reneged on a treaty commitment to compensate the Eleko.

Embarrassed at being publicly called duplicitous in this way, the British required the Eleko to disown Macaulay. He issued a public statement clarifying his position on Macaulay’s statement but declined to disown him through the Oba’s Bell Ringers, as the Brits required.

Unable to secure the support of the popular Eleko, the colonists chose to head off rising tension by deposing him. On 6 August 1925, they issued an ordinance de-stooling him and, two days later, on 8 August, they arrested and removed the Eleko into internal banishment in Oyo. In his place, they installed Oba Ibikunle Akitoye.

Akitoye’s rule lasted an uncomfortably brief three years, largely because he lacked the support of the people of Lagos. Indeed, in 1926 he suffered physical assault by his people. Supported by the elite and people of Lagos, the deposed Eleko took his case to the courts, fighting all the way once more to the Privy Council, which decided on 19 June 1928 in favour of his claim for leave for a writ of habeas corpus. This all but sealed the fate of Akitoye, who is suspected to have facilitated his own earthly demise shortly thereafter.

The crisis in Rivers State shares some unsettling similarities with the events in Lagos nearly one century ago. In Rivers today, as in Lagos then, a powerful man – in this case the current minister of the Federal Capital Territory and immediate past governor of Rivers State, Nyesom Wike – seeks to banish the current governor of Rivers State, Siminalayi Fubara, from office using surrogates beholden to him in the state House of Assembly.

There is one important difference, though: the issues in Rivers State today hardly involve principle or the public interest. Framed though they are in legalese, these cases from Rivers State are about power and money grab. This is not a first. It appears to be the standard procedure of the current FCT Minister to seek to inveigle judges into acting as his political surrogates under the ruse of law.

In instigating this crisis, Wike suffered a characteristic failure of his frontal lobe and forgot his public vow to “give himself that respect” and not interfere in the affairs of the state after his exit from the office in May 2023. Rather, since leaving office as the state governor, Wike has sought to install himself as both the minister in Abuja and sole administrator in Port Harcourt. He makes no effort to conceal the fact that much of what passes as his political dare-devilry appears to be accomplished under the influence of sufficiently gluttonous amounts of a dangerous beverage as to entitle him to access to a defence of automatism in criminal law.

In October 2024, he told Seun Okinbaloye, with undisguised hubris on Channels Television, that the only solution to the crisis in Rivers State was for the incumbent governor to “obey court judgment.” This was no advocate for the rule of law, however. Instead, Wike projected an air of political impregnability purchased with a currency bearing a distinct whiff of procured judicial crookery.

To be fair, this is not something entirely unexpected of an ambitious Nigerian politician without an alternative address (apologies to Deji Adeyanju). What is more difficult to overlook is the high judicial tolerance for undisguised political importuning of judges.

Nigeria’s judicial system has been overtaken by a category known as “political cases.” In November 2023, former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola, reported that his Supreme Court registered 1,271 motions and appeals from 12 September 2022 to 11 July, 2023, out of this, the court “heard 388 political appeals, 215 criminal appeals and 464 civil appeals.” Two years earlier, in 2021, Ariwoola’s predecessor, Tanko Muhammad, reported that the court’s portfolio of 269 appeals disposed of included 139 civil appeals, 102 criminal appeals, and 28 “political cases”.

According to Ariwoola’s report, the court “delivered a total number of 251 judgments, of which 125 were political appeals, 81 were civil appeals, and 45 were criminal appeals.” In just two years, the output of the court fell by 6.69 per cent but “political cases” rose from 10.67 per cent to 49.8 per cent. Even allowing for the fact that 2023 was an election year, this is system collapse.

Nigeria’s judges appear to have decided that the only people entitled to exit from the courts are politicians. In turn, the politicians are happy to enjoy this exclusivity and to overwhelm the courts to the point that even judges now complain. They hire the priciest lawyers to frame undisguised power and money grabs as questions of law.

The Supreme Court can end this but feigns reluctance to. Rather, the court affords powerful politicians the kind of tolerance that they are unwilling to extend to lesser mortals, preferring instead to enable this joint enterprise of senior lawyers and politicians while fettering its own capacity to determine for itself what should be a question of law deserving of its rarefied attention.

This sucks for many reasons. It prostitutes the bench; casualises the constitutional guarantee of fair trial “within a reasonable time”; and portrays the judiciary as captured.

To describe this as Supreme pusillanimity is to be generous. It is a form of judicial lasciviousness syndrome, promenading judicial wares before political gawkers in a peonage system in which the only effective currency is high political patronage. In these Rivers State cases, the Supreme Court has an opportunity to make a bold statement. If it doesn’t, then it should be ready for many more proxy war days yet.

**Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, a professor of law, teaches at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and can be reached through This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Ashton Jackson

Drew Houston’s company was born from a very millennial problem.

As a student at MIT, Houston repeatedly lost USB drives with important information on them, he told “Lenny’s Podcast” in an episode that aired earlier this month. In 2007, at age 24, he got fed up and created a cloud storage platform for his own personal use. Later, he built it out into the file-hosting company Dropbox — which has a $9.62 billion market cap, as of Thursday afternoon.

“I started Dropbox more out of just personal frustration,” said Houston, now 41. “It really felt like something only I was super interested in as far as file syncing, and focusing on one customer, which was myself.”

This wasn’t Houston’s first entrepreneurial foray: He’d launched an SAT prep company called Accolade in 2004. The gig was “ramen profitable, so to speak, but more importantly a great introduction to the wild world of starting companies,” he writes on his LinkedIn profile.

Dropbox’s success, in contrast, gave Houston a net worth of of $2.3 billion, according to Forbes. He remains the company’s CEO today, overseeing more than 700 million users from 180 different countries on the platform.

But Dropbox’s growth didn’t happen overnight.

‘They just totally nuked our business model’

Popularizing cloud storage was a double-edged sword, Houston said: As Dropbox became popular, it increasingly had to survive competition from giants like Apple, Microsoft and Google.

“All of them launched competing products in one form or another,” said Houston. “Steve Jobs was on stage in 2011 announcing iCloud, calling out Dropbox by name as something that will be viewed as archaic. And similarly, we always felt like we were in the shadow of the hammer of Google launching Google Drive.”

Dropbox was relatively large itself by that point, with a reported $4 billion valuation in 2011. Over the next few years, it acquired an email app called Mailbox and launched a photo management app called Carousel.

But new product lines couldn’t solve a bigger problem: By 2015, platforms like Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram were providing some of Dropbox’s core file-sharing services for free.

“They just totally nuked our business model ... [It was] even worse because it was so easily anticipated,” Houston said. “So this became a very public and personal embarrassment for me. How could we not have predicted that, or been out in front of that?”

‘All you can control is how you respond’

Houston read business books to help him strategize, including “Playing to Win” by ex-Proctor and Gamble head Alan G. Lafley, he said. His takeaway: Focus on what you can control and do well, instead of what your competitors are doing.

Dropbox shuttered Carousel and Mailbox, cutting an undisclosed amount of staff. It launched Magic Pocket in 2015, an “in-house multi-exabyte storage system” that allowed Dropbox users to handle bigger file uploads and store files at a larger scale — a new competitive edge, said Houston.

The lesson, he said, is to view challenges as opportunities to improve: Without the strong competition, Dropbox might never have pushed itself to grow.

“Every time you move up a league, your reward is a stronger and better opponent and potentially a more unlevel playing field,” said Houston. “That’s just the way it is. You can’t control that. All you can control is how you respond.”

 

CNBC

Page 4 of 521
January 31, 2025

3 tried-and-true strategies For small businesses to emerge stronger no matter what the economy looks…

Nathan Miller Key Takeaways Small businesses showcase optimism for 2025 despite economic challenges such as…
February 01, 2025

Tinubu targeting opposition, not corruption — Atiku

Former Vice President and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has criticized the…
January 30, 2025

This job interview question can help you spot a green flag boss

I’ve always been told to ask a couple questions at the end of job interviews:…
February 01, 2025

Humans to compete against humanoid robots at half-marathon

China’s capital city of Beijing is all set to host an interesting half-marathon that will…
January 28, 2025

Gunmen invade Abuja community, abduct father, mother, son from their bedroom

Hoodlums suspected to be kidnappers have invaded the Chikakore area of Kubwa in Bwari Area…
February 01, 2025

Here’s the latest as Israel-Hamas war enters Day 484

Three Israeli hostages, including dual US and French citizens, set for release in Gaza on…
January 28, 2025

From data to destiny — How AI can turbocharge your business future

Suri Nuthalapati Key Takeaways Reliable data is the cornerstone of successful AI-driven decision-making and innovation.…
January 08, 2025

NFF appoints new Super Eagles head coach

The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has appointed Éric Sékou Chelle as the new Head Coach…

NEWSSCROLL TEAM: 'Sina Kawonise: Publisher/Editor-in-Chief; Prof Wale Are Olaitan: Editorial Consultant; Femi Kawonise: Head, Production & Administration; Afolabi Ajibola: IT Manager;
Contact Us: [email protected] Tel/WhatsApp: +234 811 395 4049

Copyright © 2015 - 2025 NewsScroll. All rights reserved.