Nigeria was plunged into darkness on Tuesday after the national power grid collapsed for the tenth time in 2024, disrupting electricity supply across the country. The latest failure, which occurred around 1:52 pm, affected both northern and southern regions, causing widespread outages that continued into the afternoon.

This latest collapse follows a troubling pattern of instability in the national grid. Since the beginning of the year, the grid has experienced multiple failures, including three separate collapses in just one week in October alone. On Tuesday, power generation dropped significantly from 3,631 megawatts at noon to 0.00 megawatts between 2 pm and 3 pm, as 22 power generation plants went offline. At its peak earlier in the day, power generation had reached 3,934.77 megawatts.

The Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) confirmed the disruption, attributing it to a series of trippings from both transmission lines and generating plants, which led to instability in the grid. TCN spokesperson Ndidi Mbah assured the public that engineers were working to restore power, with bulk power supply already being gradually restored to Abuja by 2:49 pm.

Affected electricity distribution companies, including Ikeja DisCo in Lagos and the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company, issued notices to their customers about the outage, explaining that it was caused by the national grid failure. Power outages were reported across multiple states, including Yobe, Gombe, Bauchi, Plateau, and parts of the Southeast. The Enugu Electricity Distribution Company (EEDC) confirmed that the collapse led to a complete loss of supply in its network, which covers Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, and Imo States.

The blackout also disrupted critical services, with hospitals, schools, and businesses experiencing significant setbacks. In some regions, such as Damaturu in Yobe State, the blackout followed a recent restoration of power, exacerbating the frustrations of residents.

Despite billions in investments aimed at revitalizing Nigeria’s power sector, including loans from the World Bank and other multilateral agencies, grid collapses have become an all-too-familiar occurrence. The National Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the Ministry of Power have been criticized for their handling of the crisis, with some experts calling for a comprehensive technical investigation into the root causes of these recurrent failures.

Princewill Okorie, convener of the Electricity Consumer Protection Advocacy Centre, expressed concern that consumers continue to pay high electricity bills despite the ongoing outages, often with no clear explanation of the underlying technical issues. “We need a complete overhaul of the grid system, with more attention to the quality of materials used and the professionalism of those building the infrastructure,” he said.

Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, has suggested that the solution to the frequent grid collapses may lie in creating multiple, regional grids to ensure greater stability. However, he acknowledged that until the nation’s power infrastructure is fully overhauled, the instability and blackouts will persist.

This latest collapse has raised further questions about the government’s ability to provide consistent and reliable electricity, a critical challenge for the nation’s economy and the everyday lives of its citizens.

An Abuja court on Tuesday released 119 individuals, including minors, who had been detained in connection with anti-government protests earlier this year. The protesters had faced charges, including treason and inciting a military coup, following the widespread demonstrations against economic hardship in August. Some of the charges carried the death penalty.

The Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed the treasonable charges after the federal government decided to withdraw them. The case had initially been set for a hearing in January but was fast-tracked after President Bola Tinubu ordered the release of all minors detained during the protests and instructed that charges against them be dropped.

“The case has been struck out and the 119 protesters have been released,” said Deji Adeyanju, the legal counsel representing the detainees. “Now, we are calling for their rehabilitation and compensation by their respective state governments.”

The decision to drop the charges was made by the Attorney General of the Federation, who assumed control of the case from the police. In his ruling, Obiora Egwuata noted that the Attorney General had the authority under Nigerian law to take over and discontinue criminal cases, in line with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

The protesters had been charged with a range of serious offenses, including attempting to destabilize the Nigerian government and inciting the military to take over from Tinubu. The charges also accused them of participating in violent protests, burning government buildings, and distributing anti-government materials. Some of the defendants were alleged to have worked with a British national, Andrew Martin Wynne (also known as Andrew Povich), to carry out the protests aimed at destabilizing the country.

Earlier this month, some of the accused collapsed in court shortly after the proceedings began, reportedly due to hunger and ill health, which led to a temporary suspension of the trial.

Prominent Nigerian human rights lawyers Femi Falana and Dantinin Kyari, representing the defendants, did not oppose the withdrawal of the charges, acknowledging the application was consistent with the Child Rights Act and the well-being of the accused.

Despite the legal victory, the protestors’ legal team continues to press for compensation and rehabilitation for those affected by the detentions. They are also calling for systemic reforms to prevent such instances in the future, citing the adverse impact on the accused’s lives, especially minors involved in the protests.

The decision to release the detainees and drop the charges signals a significant moment in the ongoing debate about freedom of expression and the right to protest in Nigeria, a country that has faced criticism for its handling of public demonstrations in recent years.

Members of the local vigilantes from Madaka community in Rafi Local Government Area of Niger State on Monday laid ambush for bandits and killed no fewer than 16 persons while several others escaped with bullets injuries.

Three members of the local vigilantes, however, lost their lives during the gun battle which a source close to the community described as very fierce and lasted for well over three hours.

About 20 kidnapped victims, mostly travelers who were abducted by the Bandits, and were being moved to their camps around Birin Gwari in Kaduna state, however, escaped to freedom when the vigilantes engaged them in the battle.

According to a reliable source from Madaka community, the vigilantes got wind of the movement of the bandits and decided to lay ambush for them  which led to the heavy casualties on the side of the bandits.

“We got information about their movement and we  decided to lay ambush for them. They were moving with some victims they had abducted from the road on that day.

“Some were in the front leading the victims, while majority of them were following from behind, so we concentrated on those at the back but those in the front killed three of our men. We asked the kidnapped victims to lie down so that stray bullets would not hit them. It was after the battle that we handed them over to security agents”.

The victims were made up of business people who were on their way to the Southern parts of the country when they were abducted by the bandits between Tegina and Zungeru in the same Rafi LGA.

In another development, no fewer than 35 people, all members of Pandogari community in the same Rafi LGA have been abducted by another group of bandits at Katakwo village along Tegina-Zungeru road.

They were said to be traveling in four commercial vehicles to Minna, the state capital when they were waylaid and abducted.

A commercial driver who refused to be taken away by the Gunmen was slaughtered on the road and his body abandoned.

“The commercial driver told them that even if they went with him, there was nobody to pay ransom for his release and they decided to slaughter him on the road “.

The escalation of the bandits activities is coming after the state Governor, Umaru Bago, was said to have empowered the local Vigilantes across the volatile areas of the state with a view to curtailing the activities of  bandits

Meanwhile, four bandits on Sunday voluntarily turned in their weapons and surrendered, saying that they were tired of criminal acts, but pleaded with the government to rehabilitate them as they had nothing to fall back to after leaving  crime.

A source within the community told our Correspondent that the repented bandits and their families have been handed over to the military that are stationed at Pandogari community and they have been moved to Minna.

According to our source, more bandits were ready to repent and lay down their arms if their safety could be guaranteed.

According  to Niger State police public relation officer, Wasiu Abiodun, the police have  rescued 19 kidnapped victims unhurt.

Sun

Netanyahu sacks defence minister, jolting Israeli politics as war grinds on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fired Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Tuesday, citing a “crisis of trust”, and replaced him with close ally Israel Katz to lead the country’s war in Gaza and Lebanon.

Netanyahu’s critics accused him of putting politics ahead of national security at a time when Israel is bracing for Iranian retaliation to its attack.

After Gallant was fired, protesters in Israel blocked highways and lit bonfires on roads, police said.

The prime minister named Gideon Saar as the new foreign minister in place of Katz.

Israel’s campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon have entered new phases following the killing of top commanders in both Hamas and Lebanese armed group Hezbollah.

Netanyahu said Gallant has made statements that “contradict the decisions of the government and the decisions of the cabinet”. In response, Gallant said: “The security of the state of Israel always was and will always remain my life’s mission.”

Katz vowed the return of Israel’s hostages from Gaza and destruction of Hamas and Hezbollah.

“I accept this responsibility with a sense of mission and holy fear for the security of the State of Israel and its citizens,” Katz said on social media platform X.

Gayil Talshir, a specialist in Israeli politics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, believed the last straw for Netanyahu came this week when Gallant issued 7,000 draft notices for ultra-Orthodox Haredi men, angering those in the government who oppose conscription.

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid said on X, however, that “firing Gallant in the middle of a war is an act of madness.”

In Washington, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council said Gallant had been an important partner and that it would continue working collaboratively with Katz.

Gallant rose to the rank of general during a 35-year military career.

France’s foreign minister will travel to Israel and the Palestinian territories on Wednesday, a day after U.S. elections, to press Israel to engage diplomatically to end the conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon.

NORTHERN GAZA AIRSTRIKES

Earlier on Tuesday, Israeli forces issued new evacuation orders in the northern Gaza Strip and carried out military strikes which Palestinian medics and media said had killed at least 35 people since Monday night.

Acting U.N. aid chief Joyce Msuya said on X that Israeli military ground operations in northern Gaza had left Palestinians “without the essentials to survive, forced them to flee for safety multiple times, and cut off their escape and supply routes.”

An airstrike late on Monday damaged two houses in the town of Beit Lahiya, killing at least 20 people, the Palestinian official news agency WAFA and Hamas media said.

Ten were killed in central areas of the Palestinian enclave - six in separate airstrikes on Gaza City and the town of Deir Al-Balah, and four in the town of Al-Zawayda around midnight on Monday, medics and health officials said.

At least five others were killed in an Israeli strike on a house in Jabalia north of Gaza City, medics said later on Tuesday.

The Israeli military said, without giving details, that its forces had “eliminated terrorists” in the central Gaza Strip and Jabalia area. Israeli troops had also located weapons and explosives over the past day in the southern Rafah area, where “terrorist infrastructure sites” had been eliminated, it said.

Later on Tuesday, Israeli planes dropped leaflets over Beit Lahiya ordering residents who have not yet left their homes and shelters housing displaced families to quit the town completely.

“To all those who remained at homes and shelters, you are risking your lives. For your safety you have to head south,” said the leaflet, which was written in Arabic.

Palestinians said the new attacks and Israeli orders for evacuations were aimed at emptying areas to create buffer zones.

Israel says the evacuations are meant to keep civilians out of harm’s way as its troops battle Hamas fighters.

More than 43,300 Palestinians have been killed in more than a year of war in Gaza, health authorities in Gaza say.

The war began after Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies.

Reuters

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

Putin reiterates Russia’s willingness to engage in talks with Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin has once again reiterated Moscow's readiness for talks with Kiev.

"I have said it more than once that Russia is not just ready for talks but has already held such talks at a certain point, specifically at the very beginning of this conflict," he stated during a ceremony of receiving credentials from foreign ambassadors. "Those talks even resulted in a mutually acceptable treaty, which was initialed by the Ukrainian side."

"But the Ukrainian side rejected that treaty on the advice of external parties, as confirmed by Ukrainian officials," the president recalled.

Nearly three hours of talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul on March 29, 2022, yielded principles for a potential agreement, including Ukraine's commitment to maintain a neutral, non-aligned status and its pledge to refrain from deploying foreign weapons, including nuclear weapons, on its territory.

However, after Russia withdrew its forces from the Kiev and Chernigov regions, the settlement talks were frozen. According to President Putin, Kiev rejected the agreements. The Ukrainian side has claimed that the rejection was made on the advice of then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Zelenskiy says clashes with North Korean troops 'open page' to instability

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday that the first battles between the Ukrainian military and North Korean troops "open a new page in instability in the world" after his defence minister said a "small engagement" had taken place.

Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov confirmed, in an interview with South Korean television, that the first engagement had occurred with North Korean troops, an apparent escalation in a conflict that began when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.

Zelenskiy, in his nightly video address, thanked those in the world who, he said, had reacted to the dispatch of North Korean troops to Russia last month "not just with words ... but who are preparing actions to support our defence.

"The first battles with North Korean soldiers open a new page of instability in the world," he said.

He said that Ukraine, acting with the rest of the world, had to "do everything so that this Russian step to expand the war with real escalation fails."

Umerov, the defence minister, told South Korea's KBS television in an interview broadcast on Tuesday that there had been a "small engagement" with North Korean troops.

"Yes, I think so. It is (an) engagement," Umerov said in English, when asked if a clash had occurred.

The report, with excerpts from the interview, quoted Umerov as saying that the engagement was small and not yet systematic in terms of mobilising soldiers.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

TROOPS IN FRONTLINE AREAS

South Korea's Defence Ministry said on Tuesday that more than 10,000 North Korean troops had arrived in Russia, with a "significant number" in the frontline areas, including the Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces staged an incursion in August.

Zelenskiy quoted intelligence sources as saying on Monday that 11,000 North Koreans were in Russia. The Pentagon said at least 10,000 North Korean soldiers were in Kursk, but it could not corroborate suggestions that they had been engaged in combat.

The KBS report said Umerov told the interviewer that identification and other procedures would take time as the Russian military was trying to pass off the North Koreans as Buryats, a Mongolian ethnic group from Siberian regions.

Umerov said he expected a sharp rise in the number of North Koreans deployed.

"(There are) already contacts, but after a couple of weeks, we would see a more significant number and upon this, we will review it and analyse it," he said.

Expectations that North Korean troops would undergo a month's training, he said, appeared to have been shortened to one or two weeks to allow swifter deployment to the battlefield.

Russia has not acknowledged that North Korean troops are on its territory, but Putin last week did not deny reports of their presence. He said it was up to Russia how to implement its defence pact with Pyongyang.

Tass/Reuters

The Afenifere can’t condone inequity. Tinubu’s tribalism has been alarming. They are embarrassed. It’s uncultured. The Yoruba are relatively too advanced for such a retrogressive political palliative scheme. They need neither to be pushed like a battery-handicapped kabukabu nor to be fed mashed food like a toothless adult. On no scale are they backward, comparatively.

They are the proud champions of equity, industry and merit. Tinubu’s untiring devotion to sectionalism serves neither the values of the Yoruba nor the interests of the country. On the other hand, Afenifere’s response could be summed up as a disdainful smirk. Perhaps, Tinubu’s tribalism is a glimpse of the long-prophesied denouement. The belated coming out of the shadows. Are we then now condemned to a few more years of startling self-debasing shenanigans?

The name ‘Progressive’ which Obafemi Awolowo, Bola Ige and Abraham Adesanya cherished has already become almost redundant, a hollow moniker. Perhaps, worse. A useful piece in the paraphernalia of many a Nigerian political sorcerer. Used to bewitch and hold spellbound the famished and luckless electorate thirsting for a democracy that yields development and moral reformation. Tinubu is the last apostle of old school progressivism.

Now, the people must realise that they have been hoodwinked and accept that progressivism in Nigeria politics has been almost irreparably contaminated. It now accommodates all shades of political yahooyahooism. If the nostalgic lovers of progressives remain enthralled with the sentimental idea, then, they can continue to wallow in their delusion that progressivism in Nigeria is moral and people oriented rather than manipulative shallow machiavellianism.

That whole idea of a Sovereign National Conference, it now appears, was an elaborate ruse. It’s erstwhile imperativeness was carefully contrived. Sovereign National Conference, the sort peddled by NADECO activists as the alchemy for national preservation, unity and progress must now be seen as specious sophistry. It has fallen into comical disuse. It has outlived its dubious usefulness. The pro democracy sermons have yielded the long desired fruit. The foil of democracy was used to conceal lust for power and a predilection for rabid opportunism. Is the denouement just beginning? That’s the question. Are we destined for more shege?

The Yoruba elite are cringing. Tinubu’s tribalism has no clothes. Those not cringing are sneering at the nation. The stark nudity suggests benign aloofness or devious shamelessness. They say the electorate is to blame. The finger-pointing is now happening in all directions. Yet a few cannot understand the hullabaloo. They are irritated by the effete sensibilities of their detribalised kinsmen. Power has been grabbed.

Northerners are more fatalistic, they say God gives it. So whether Emilokan, Awalokan or Yorubalokan, it must be attributed to God. So these few have no apologies. Because, it’s turn by turn. “Omo Igbo will be worse”, they say. Though they had a recent turn in Obasanjo, but he wasn’t a turn. It was a forgettable turn, they say. Tinubu, the Asiwaju of the universe, has come to make audacious amends. To give them two turns in one. A reparative double portion. So, he is probably settling many scores. If so, why did Tinubu bother changing the national anthem? Perish the thought that the idea came from the NASS.

The lawmakers will rather discuss Bobrisky in the plenary. Back to Tinubu. He didn’t revert to the old anthem to motivate the nation. He has been too brazen to bother. At his level of self absorption and indulgence, he could have effected the change to satisfy the urge of nostalgia. The goal was never to rally the riven country or forge cohesion. No, that’s not his current priority. Tribes and tongues may differ all they care, all he wants is for folks to ‘stand on his mandate.’

For grown men to fawn and genuflect and mutter self-deprecating gibberish to lionize the man. Beyond the settling of scores, there could be the other objective of a kinsmen-assisted transmutation into emperorship. A tax obsessed man who perpetually demands sacrifices of the poor while living lavishly. His choices do not reflect any concept of national broadminded brotherhood, but the narrow brotherhood of self perpetuating sectionalism. Nigerians, all Nigerians are proud to serve the fatherland. But it appears, Tinubu thinks more like a prime Sunday Igboho than Tinubu of 2004.

Igboho, before his native charms failed, lost signals, in Cotonou, allowing the Beninoise police to subject him to an impromptu sabbatical. If Tinubu’s tribalism is actually borne of uncomplicated Yoruba exceptionalism, then we must liken him to Nnamdi Kanu, who thinks the Igbo are a special breed and their neighbours, genetically inferior. As it stands, the fatherland during Tinubu’s reign is best served by Omoluabis who can stand on the mandate with religious loyalty. Who knows? When the Ooni went into a frenzy marrying fair women, many hissed derisively. But those in the know say it wasn’t him. It was the oracle. So who knows what’s really driving Tinubu’s parochialism.

We must then be charitable. We must extend pity to all the non-Yorubas in Tinubu’s government. They must know by now that they are mere furniture, positioned deftly to satisfy all that is left of a dispensable righteousness. No matter how servile they become, they can’t earn the trust. Technical impostors, all of them, when they speak with any certainty about government policy or direction. They don’t belong. They should tiptoe. They can’t shout. Like black Africans working for the office of district colonial power. Their zealousness is naivety or mischief. They must mew and whisper. It’s not their turn. They are free riders. No matter how important they might feel or how large they once thought they were, they must now contain themselves. When they get to their distant villages, like Agulu, they can drop names. There, they can brag about their ownership of Tinubu and co-ownership of the government. But they must not let it get into their heads. Around Abuja, they must behave. Blood is thicker than water. For this regime right now, blood is trust, blood is intelligence, blood is beautiful. Outsiders must be sniffed. They are potential moles who are potentially slothful. Only a few of them must be given sensitive roles.

Buhari once said he belonged to no one, though many swore that he belonged to the North. It’s difficult to know what he did to Tinubu. Tinubu appears to be saying that everybody belongs to him. He has left nobody guessing. Once you list the critical offices, ministries and juicy agencies, you know the tribe of the man in charge. These are the leaders of the party that enchanted the people with the promise of Change. We rotate power to share sense of belonging and build cohesion.

A man takes the rotated power, out of turn, to settle scores and transmogrify in the Oba of Nigeria. Where will he stop? We can absorb more tribalism. Allow Tinubu select only the Yoruba to head all powerful and lucrative minsteries and agencies to retsore hope. We are that elatsic. We can even embrace some rituals of obeisance, like go round to compel all Radio and TV stations to sing On Your Mandate every morning at 7 a.m. To appreciate his long standing dedication to the cause of democracy and social justice.

We can also allow his business partners start building multi-trillion naira coastal roads all around the country without due process. We can just say that they are the best builders in the country. But will that be enough? At some point we might just adopt Yoruba as a national language and change the title of president to Oba. I will suggest it to Akpabio, Mr President will like that. Then we can change the tenure to ten years. To deepen democracy. That’s a progressive idea.

Peter Daisyme

Key Takeaways

• Consistent, strategic effort is essential for long-term business growth; shortcuts won't sustain success.
• Analyzing competition, building authentic brands, and forging partnerships are crucial for business expansion.

When you grow a plant from seed, you can't afford to miss a step. You must plant it at the correct depth, in proper soil, and give it the right amount of water and sun. Do everything right, and it will grow and flourish. Fail, and it will as well.

Your business is no different. It takes time, attention, and knowledge to help it expand by whatever criteria you think is important. That could be the number of employees, annual sales, profit margins, customer satisfaction, page rankings on search engines, media coverage and more. By whatever measure you choose, you'll need to tend it well.

If growing your business is your goal, determine what will get you there and pursue it. Taking shortcuts may be okay for a minute, but not for sustained growth over the long term. Here are three steps you shouldn't skip.

1. Find out who you're up against

Analyzing your competition is one step no business can pass over. The fact is, who your competition is and how they're faring is a moving target. Brands need to be constantly engaged in upping their game if they want to grow.

Currently, content is the tool most companies use to move up in search results, which correlates with success. But throwing out content and hoping something sticks isn't effective. You need to determine where your content strategies are falling short and determine how to fill those gaps. You can start by manually analyzing your competitors' content and comparing it to yours. Please take a look at their blog, social media accounts, internal linking strategy, and more to help identify any gaps.

However, not everyone has the time to spend scrolling through every competitor's website to find out why it's achieving higher SERPs. Leveraging tools like the MarketMuse competitive content analysis feature saves time and money. Plus, it provides granular insights into where your competition excels and where your brand can overtake it.

This technology can examine a competitor's entire website content in a minute and rank strength by site, page, or topic. It takes seconds to see where you can take advantage of your competitor's content gaps to make your own strategy excel. That's time well spent.

2. Forge a commitment-worthy brand

Businesses used to grow if they sold quality products and services. These attributes would appeal to new customers and help them hang onto old ones. But customers – and employees – are now looking for so much more when making decisions. To grow, your brand needs to address those complexities.

Your company needs to embrace such core values as transparency, authenticity, and social responsibility. You must demonstrably put people before profits and incorporate a worldview in your mission, even if you're small. Lip service isn't enough. Your brand must display its commitment to these values openly, day in and day out.

In a world where technology plays an increasingly larger role in everyday life, customers expect companies to use it to forge more personal relationships with them. Mass-market appeals are passe, and generational differences have become larger divides. You'll need to address every demographic with content, messaging, and values that resonate specifically with each of them.

Growing your business means building a bigger tent and inviting more people inside. There, you have to prove to them why you're worth their time and money instead of your competition. Keeping customers loyal while drawing others in is why you'll need larger and larger tents. But that's the goal.

3. Use partnerships to your advantage.

It can feel like your business is fighting to succeed all on its own. And it will be if you aren't forging strategic partnerships that can help you get ahead of your competition. Entering into these mutually beneficial relationships is a step you can't afford to miss. And to avoid a misstep, partner with those who share your core values.

Energy drinks and video cameras may seem dissimilar. But Red Bull and GoPro's co-branding strategy is a winner for two companies that consider themselves sellers of lifestyles as much as products. The partnership opens doors to new customers for both.

Explore your supply chain for collaborative opportunities that could make it more reliable and efficient and save you money. That's the logic behind the long-time union between McDonald's and Coca-Cola. You may use only one shipping vendor or packaging supplier exclusively for your brand.

Look at your accounts payable and gauge the potential for formalizing partnerships with those you're doing business with. Marketing, packaging and shipping, wholesale products, raw materials, and technology are a few areas ripe for collaboration. Once you find them, don't let them wither on the vine. You may need to make some adjustments occasionally to ensure you're both reaping the rewards. If you aren't, find another partner who will deliver.

Get growing

It's rare that a business reaches a certain size and intentionally stops growing. Stagnation is a precedent for shrinkage. If growth is what you want for your brand, take the stairs. Just be sure you don't miss one on the way up.

Entrepreneur

The current controversy surrounding the Tax Reform Bills introduced by President Bola Tinubu highlights a significant and contentious issue: the principle of derivation in the proposed Value Added Tax (VAT) sharing formula. At the heart of the matter is a proposed increase in the derivation percentage from 20% to 60% for VAT revenues, a move that has ignited fervent opposition, particularly from Northern political leaders. Their concerns raise critical questions about equity, regional balance, and the historical context of Nigeria’s fiscal policies.

Historically, the derivation principle has undergone significant transformations. Initially, during the colonial period, regions retained 100% of mineral revenues, reflecting a decentralized approach to resource management. This shifted over time, with military regimes imposing increasingly restrictive allocations that often undermined the autonomy of resource-rich states. The introduction of the 13% minimum derivation formula in the 1999 Constitution was a hard-won concession for oil-producing states, primarily in the Niger Delta, which have long fought for a fair share of the wealth extracted from their lands.

The proposed changes in the VAT sharing formula, however, threaten to exacerbate existing regional tensions. By allocating 60% of VAT based on derivation—essentially rewarding states based on their consumption rather than production—President Tinubu’s reforms seem to favor states like Lagos and Rivers, which are more consumption-oriented. This raises valid concerns about perceived bias in a governance structure already fraught with accusations of favoritism.

The Northern Governors’ Forum’s swift rejection of the tax bills stems from fears that such a significant increase in derivation will only deepen disparities between regions, favoring the South while marginalizing the North.

Equity demands that if the government considers increasing derivation for VAT, similar adjustments should be made across all revenue sources, including mineral resources and Company Income Tax. The current proposal appears selective and risks entrenching regional disparities rather than alleviating them. It is not just about the allocation of VAT but about setting a precedent for how fiscal policies are crafted in a country marked by diversity and regional inequalities.

Furthermore, the historical context of the derivation principle underscores the need for a balanced approach. The gradual decline of derivation percentages from the colonial era to the present has created a landscape where resource-rich states often feel shortchanged, while less resource-endowed states depend heavily on federal allocations. A re-evaluation of how revenues are shared, grounded in the principle of derivation, should consider the historical injustices faced by various regions and strive for a fairer distribution of resources.

The ongoing debates surrounding these tax reform bills are not merely about percentages; they encapsulate the broader struggle for equity and justice within Nigeria’s federal system. If President Tinubu’s administration seeks to build a truly united Nigeria, it must address these disparities with transparency and inclusiveness, ensuring that all states benefit from the nation’s collective wealth, rather than a select few. The challenge lies in crafting a fiscal policy that honors the principle of derivation while promoting a sense of shared destiny among all Nigerians. Only then can Nigeria’s social formations hope to move past regional grievances and build a more equitable future for the country.

President Bola Tinubu has directed the immediate release of all minors detained in connection with the #EndBadGovernance protests held in August, following widespread local and international condemnation of their treatment. The move comes after a harrowing court appearance last week where three minors and an adult collapsed from exhaustion while being arraigned, prompting calls for urgent action.

The presidential order was announced by the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, on Monday during a press briefing at the State House. Idris confirmed that the release would occur “without prejudice to any legal processes there are,” signaling that the government would not proceed with charges against the minors for their alleged role in the protests.

“The president has directed the immediate release of all minors that have been arrested by the police,” Idris said, adding that the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction would oversee their care and reunite them with their families. He further revealed that a committee would be established to investigate the conduct of all officials involved in the detention, with those found culpable facing disciplinary action. However, it remains unclear whether the investigation will extend to the police officers, prosecutors, or the judge who allowed the minors’ prolonged detention.

The decision to release the minors follows a significant backlash from human rights organizations and civil society groups both within Nigeria and abroad. Amnesty International condemned the arrest and trial of the minors, calling the use of stringent bail conditions—set at N10 million for each defendant—“arbitrary detention.” The international human rights group argued that these children should never have been detained in the first place, citing Nigeria’s widespread poverty, hunger, and political unrest.

In a strongly worded statement, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) labeled the trial of the children a “brutal targeting of protesters,” accusing the government of using children as scapegoats to suppress dissent. “The Tinubu administration must immediately and unconditionally release those detained and drop all charges against them,” the organization demanded, emphasizing that the government should focus on addressing the country’s economic challenges rather than punishing citizens for voicing their grievances.

The #EndBadGovernance protests, which took place between August 1 and 10, were sparked by growing frustration over the country’s worsening economic conditions, including high inflation, soaring fuel prices, and the removal of fuel subsidies. Demonstrators across Nigeria called for the reversal of Tinubu’s controversial economic policies, particularly the floating of the naira and the removal of subsidies on petrol.

While the protests were largely peaceful in many cities, violent clashes erupted in some areas, leading to arrests and accusations of heavy-handed police tactics, including the use of tear gas and physical assaults on demonstrators. In Abuja, where the protests remained non-violent, police detained several individuals, including the minors, many of whom were held for over three months without trial.

Despite the escalating criticisms, the police maintained that the charges against the detained individuals, which included treason, destruction of property, and public disturbance, were justified. The court had initially set stringent bail conditions for the 76 accused, including 52 minors, which many observers viewed as excessive and punitive.

The minors, aged between 14 and 17, were among the 76 arrested during the protests. According to reports, four of the children collapsed in court due to exhaustion before they could even enter a plea. Legal experts, including Akintayo Balogun, argued that the charges against the minors were legally flawed, as the Child Rights Act prohibits children from facing criminal charges that could lead to the death penalty. Balogun criticized the government for attempting to prosecute minors in a federal high court, which he said was an improper venue for cases involving children.

In response to the outcry, Nigeria’s Attorney General, Lateef Fagbemi, ordered the police to hand over the case file of the 76 defendants for further review. The Ministry of Women’s Affairs also intervened, announcing plans to transfer the case of the 52 minors to a juvenile court in accordance with Nigerian law, while also pledging to provide psychological counseling and educational support for the children once they are released.

The national and international backlash against the detention of the minors has been strong. Advocacy groups, including the Northern Elders Forum (NEF) and the Coalition of Northern Groups (CNG), have described the actions of the Nigerian government as a “gross violation of human rights.” NEF’s spokesperson, Abdul-Azeez Suleiman, condemned the charges of treason against the children, calling it a “grotesque abuse of power.” Suleiman also criticized the silence of northern state governors, accusing them of tacit approval of the government’s actions.

“Detaining and accusing mostly Northern Nigerian minors for treason amounts to shameful and unacceptable impunity,” Suleiman said. He urged for an impartial investigation into the arrests and a review of Nigeria’s treason laws, particularly as they apply to minors.

CNG’s National Coordinator, Jamilu Aliyu Charanchi, echoed these sentiments, calling the detentions a “gross violation” of constitutional rights. He emphasized that the detained minors were merely exercising their right to free expression, which is enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution. Charanchi condemned the government’s approach to governance, accusing it of prioritizing punitive measures over the welfare of citizens.

While Tinubu’s decision to release the minors has been hailed by some as a step toward rectifying the situation, it remains to be seen whether the broader issues of police brutality, the criminalization of protests, and the lack of accountability for government officials will be fully addressed. As Nigeria continues to grapple with its economic challenges, the incident has raised important questions about the treatment of its most vulnerable citizens and the state of its democracy.

As calls for justice grow louder, civil society organizations are urging the Nigerian government to uphold its commitments to human rights and engage in meaningful dialogue with its citizens to address the underlying issues fueling unrest across the country.

PRESS RELEASE

The release of the 2024 Mo Ibrahim Index on African Governance has revealed alarming trends in Nigeria’s governance performance. Ranking 33rd out of 53 African nations, with a score of 45.7 out of 100, Nigeria’s governance score has declined by 1.4 points between 2014 and 2023. This dip reflects troubling shortcomings across several key categories, including Security & Rule of Law (39.7), Participation, Rights & Inclusion (47.9), Foundations for Economic Opportunity (48.6), and Human Development (46.4).

These low scores, compounded by findings from the 2024 Transparency and Integrity Index (TII), recently released by the Center for Fiscal Transparency and Public Integrity, underscore a broader systemic decline within Nigeria’s federal, state, and local government institutions. While Nigeria has long been regarded as “the giant of Africa” due to its size, population, and resources, these rankings highlight how persistent governance failures are undermining its potential and standing both regionally and globally.

The findings in both indices emphasize the country’s struggles with transparency, public sector accountability, and the enforcement of anti-corruption measures. With ineffective governance systems in place, Nigeria faces a critical need for reform to rebuild public trust and reverse these negative trends.

The impact of Nigeria’s declining governance score is far-reaching. The lack of rule of law and security has not only created domestic instability but also deterred foreign direct investment, stalling economic growth. Issues in human development, economic opportunity, and inclusion further threaten the country’s aspirations to lead Africa in political and economic spheres. Without addressing these gaps, Nigeria’s prospects for long-term development and regional leadership remain jeopardized.

Furthermore, these governance shortcomings exacerbate problems like poverty, inequality, and inadequate infrastructure, directly affecting the quality of life for Nigerians. Failure to tackle these issues could have lasting consequences, from diminishing public trust to creating an environment ripe for corruption and impunity.

In light of these findings, the Centre for Fiscal Transparency and Public Integrity urges Nigerian authorities to take immediate action to address these governance deficits. Key reforms should include strengthening anti-corruption measures, improving transparency in government operations, enforcing the Public Procurement Act, establishing stronger protections for whistleblowers, and ensuring greater accountability across public institutions.

The country’s performance in the Security & Rule of Law category highlights the urgent need for judicial and security reforms to protect citizens’ rights, reduce lawlessness, and ensure fair application of the law. These efforts should be paired with policies that promote civic engagement and provide marginalized groups with greater opportunities for inclusion and participation.

The reports also emphasize the importance of investing in human capital to improve Nigeria’s human development indicators. Increased investment in healthcare, education, and skills training is essential to equip the workforce for future economic challenges. In addition, creating a stable business environment with transparent regulations will help attract foreign investment and support the growth of local businesses, improving Nigeria’s competitiveness on the African continent.

Finally, the Centre calls on all stakeholders—civil society, the media, the private sector, and Nigerians at large—to support efforts aimed at improving governance, upholding the rule of law, and prioritizing human development. Now is the time for committed action to restore trust, foster inclusive growth, and create a more transparent and accountable governance system.

Signed:

Victor Okebe Agi

Public Relations Officer

Centre for Fiscal Transparency and Public Integrity