Super User

Super User

Israel orders IDF to seize more Gaza territory if Hamas doesn't release hostages

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has ordered the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to seize more territory in Gaza if Hamas continues to refuse to release the hostages. Earlier this week, the IDF resumed the war in Gaza after a nearly two-month-long ceasefire that saw the release of 33 hostages.

"If the terrorist organization Hamas continues to refuse to release the hostages, I have instructed the IDF to seize additional territories, while evacuating the population, and to expand the security zones around Gaza for the benefit of protecting Israeli communities and IDF soldiers, through permanent Israeli control of the territory," Katz said in a statement. "As Hamas continues its refusal, it will lose more and more territory that will be annexed to Israel."

If Israel follows through on Katz’s threat of partial annexation, it would be the biggest shift to the status quo in Gaza in almost 20 years. In 2005, Israel evacuated Gaza and even sent in the IDF to physically take Israelis out of their homes. A year later, Hamas took control and has ruled over the Strip ever since.

Katz also said that Israel will continue Operation "Strength and Sword" with increasing intensity until Hamas releases the hostages. Additionally, he affirmed Israel’s adherence to the proposal put forth by U.S. Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff, which involves getting all hostages, alive and dead, out of Gaza in two phases.

The Trump administration is standing by Israel’s military decisions. This is a very different approach than the one taken by the Biden administration, which supported Israel militarily and diplomatically, but also put pressure on the country to limit civilian casualties in Gaza.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday that President Donald Trump "fully supports Israel and the IDF in the actions that they’ve taken in recent days." The president previously warned Hamas that there would be "hell to pay" if the hostages were not released.

"Hamas could have released hostages to extend the ceasefire but instead chose war," NSC Spokesman James Hewitt said on Thursday. "These terrorists bear total responsibility for this conflict and the resumption of hostilities. Every death would have and could have been avoided had Hamas accepted the 'bridge' proposal Special Envoy Witkoff offered last week."

While fighting the war against Gaza, Israel is also experiencing internal turmoil. On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office announced that a vote to dismiss the head of the Shin Bet, Israel’s version of the FBI, had passed. Current Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar will serve in the role until April 10, but that could change depending on when a replacement for him is found.

Netanyahu claimed he could not trust Bar, according to a statement from his spokesperson cited by Axios. In a letter distributed by the Shin Bet, Bar dismissed the claim and said the motives behind his firing were baseless. On Friday, Israel's Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction preventing Bar's dismissal, which will remain in place until the court can hear petitions against the dismissal.

 

Fox News

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE

Russia and Ukraine accuse each other of blowing up Russian gas pumping station

Russia and Ukraine accused each other on Friday of blowing up a Russian gas pumping station in a border area where Ukrainian troops have been retreating, amid talks over a proposed U.S.-backed moratorium on attacks on energy infrastructure.

Video footage showed a blaze at the Sudzha facility, which is located inside Russia several hundred metres from the Ukrainian border.

It is inside a pocket of Russian territory that had been captured by Ukrainian forces last year, but which Moscow has mostly recovered in heavy fighting in recent weeks. Russian troops pushed Ukrainian forces out of the nearby town of Sudzha last week.

Russia's defence ministry said Ukraine's troops had left the pumping station and blown it up in their retreat. Moscow described this as a violation of the moratorium on attacks on energy infrastructure, which it said it has abided by since a phone call between President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday.

Kyiv said Russian forces had blown up the facility themselves as a provocation, describing Russia's accusations as fake.

Putin agreed to the pause in attacks on energy facilities during his phone call with Trump, when Putin rejected a proposal for a more comprehensive 30-day ceasefire. Kyiv says it is prepared to accept the proposal if hammered out formally in talks.

Russia's Investigative Committee, which probes serious crimes, said it had opened a criminal case over what it called "an act of terrorism" which had done "significant damage" to the gas transit facility, which once took Russian gas to Europe.

The Ukrainian military accused Russian forces of shelling it with artillery in a false flag "provocation".

"The Russians continue to produce numerous fakes and seek to mislead the international community," the Ukrainian army General Staff said in a statement.

Andriy Yermak, the Ukrainian president's chief-of-staff, said: "Russian attempts to deceive everyone and pretend that they are 'adhering to the ceasefire' will not work, as the fake (news) about the strikes on the gas station will not work."

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the idea that Russia would destroy its own energy infrastructure was "absurd."

Reuters could not independently verify the accounts of the situation at the plant or the cause of the blast.

Peskov said earlier on Friday that Putin's order for Russian forces to temporarily halt attacks on energy infrastructure in Ukraine remained in force, and the Sudzha explosion showed Ukraine could not be trusted to keep its word.

Separately, a new explosion rocked an oil depot in Russia's southern Krasnodar region on Friday where firefighters had been trying to extinguish a blaze that had broken out on Tuesday after a Ukrainian drone attack hours after Putin spoke to Trump.

"During the extinguishing process, due to depressurisation of the burning tank, there was an explosion of oil products and release of burning oil," Russian regional authorities said on the Telegram messaging app.

The fire spread to another tank, and the fire area increased to 10,000 sq metres (108,000 sq feet), they added - more than twice the original size of the blaze. More than 450 firefighters were trying to tackle it, and two had been injured.

Russia has pounded Ukraine's energy grid throughout the war, causing frequent blackouts affecting civilians and industry, arguing that civilian infrastructure is a legitimate target because it helps Ukraine's war effort.

More recently, Kyiv has also been launching attacks on Russian oil and gas targets, which it says provide fuel for Moscow's forces in Ukraine and funds Russia's military.

 

RUSSIAN PERSPECTIVE

What is known about Ukrainian sabotage of Sudzha gas metering station

Kiev deliberately blew up the Sudzha gas metering station located a few hundred meters from the border in the Kursk Region just after midnight on March 21, the Russian Defense Ministry said.

TASS has compiled the main information about the incident.

Circumstances of explosion

- On March 21, at about 12:20 a.m. Moscow time (9:20 p.m. GMT on March 20), Kiev deliberately blew up the Sudzha gas metering station through which Russian gas is pumped to Europe, the ministry said.

- The Ukrainian troops used the facility as a secure logistics point while the station was under their control.

- The Russian Defense Ministry called the blowing up of the gas metering station a "deliberate Ukrainian provocation" that should be seen as part of a general series of recent attacks on Russia's energy infrastructure aimed at derailing US President Donald Trump's peace initiatives.

Criminal case

- Investigators have opened a criminal case in connection with the Sudzha gas metering station incident, Russian Investigative Committee Spokeswoman Svetlana Petrenko told TASS.

- During the preliminary investigation, all those involved in the crime will be identified and brought to justice, Petrenko added.

- The facility suffered significant damage as a result of the explosion.

 

Reuters/Tass

"It's a matter of taking the side of the weak against the strong, something the best people have always done." - Harriet Beecher Stowe.

Not as many people know the popular novel Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852), which depicts the harsh conditions experienced by enslaved African Americans, as they know its author, Harriet Elisabeth Beecher Stowe (June 14, 1811 – July 1, 1896). She was an American author and abolitionist. Coming from the religious Beecher family, her book reached an audience of millions as both a novel and a play. It became influential in the United States and Great Britain, energizing anti-slavery forces in the American North while provoking widespread anger in the South.

As an abolitionist—someone who sought to abolish slavery—and advocate for the full emancipation of enslaved people, Harriet stood by the weak. There is virtue in standing by the weak and vulnerable. It is also a core Islamic virtue, exemplified by Prophet Muhammad's actions and teachings. A virtue rooted in compassion, justice, and the protection of the vulnerable. He stood for the oppressed, including the poor, orphans, and widows.

But Natasha is neither poor nor a widow. The beauty who made heads turn on her first day in the Senate (recall the senator who had to be called to order when he started talking about her beauty on the Senate floor) is also not voiceless.

But despite a beauty so astounding that a former senator, who was also a minister, had to confess to the world that: “The beauty of Distinguished Senator Natasha is a problem to her,” and that “there is no way, when she is passing, that a man will not look at that woman,” my leaning towards her is because she is the underdog, and I am one person who loves to pitch his tent with the underdog. Some say this predilection is rooted in compassion, empathy, justice, and a commitment to protecting those who cannot defend themselves.

However, Natasha is an Amazon who can defend herself. Ask Yahaya Bello. I am sure he would tell you she is "one hell" of an uncommon woman he would never want to have as an opponent. And this is why I laughed when the Senate President (SP), Godswill Akpabio, lamented that her actions had traumatized the Senate. That ₦15 billion clinic he plans to build for senators should be a Trauma Centre because, with Natasha, as the Americans would say, "he ain't seen no trauma yet."

Even her name, Natasha, is uncommon in Nigeria. Though well-known and commonly used in Ukraine, it is Russian. It is a diminutive form of the Latin name Natalia, meaning "born on Christmas Day" or "birthday of the Lord." She might have gotten that name courtesy of her Ukrainian mother, Ludmila Kravchenko, from Rakitna, Chernivtsi, in Ukraine. But without a doubt, her beauty was inherited from her mother. It looks like it is not only the beauty she got from her mummy but also her fighting spirit. Did you not see how Ukraine took on Mighty Russia? We are not talking about the wisdom, but the "balls" to not back down from a fight.

Again, that fighting spirit may have come to her from two sides. Barrister Natasha Hadiza Akpoti, born on December 9, 1979, in Ilorin, was sired by a Nigerian Igbira father, Dr Jimoh Abdul Akpoti, from Ihima, of the Emani clan in Kogi State. The Igbira are known warriors, but those of Iheme, particularly the Emani, are more dreaded.

Many people tend to assume that Natasha was suspended—a suspension that is under contention—for six months because she alleged that the SP harassed her sexually. No, the "gadfly" belle of the red chamber was hammered with a six-month suspension purportedly because she went against a Senate rule. And going against Senate rules means your constituency would pay for it by your suspension! But we know West Idahosa, revealed that he heard the SP instructing that Natasha’s suspension be prepared even before the Ethics Committee deliberated on her “crime.”

One may want to know where the other female senators were when their colleague was being hounded. Rightly or wrongly, there is an unwritten law for kindred to look out for each other, even if they would talk the truth to themselves behind closed doors later.

However, those waiting to see that may wait till “Thy Kingdom Come” because Nigerian women are not known to stand by their ilk. Sarah Jibril can attest to that. Despite her advocacy for the emancipation and empowerment of Nigerian women and children, she got only one vote (apparently hers) at the 2011 Peoples Democratic Party’s presidential primary elections despite the many female delegates who voted. She fared better four years earlier when she got four votes.

Some would say most Nigerian women prefer to behave like the women in the following story: “Soldiers entered a village and raped all the women. Only one resisted a soldier, killed him, and cut off his head! After the soldiers completed their mission and returned to their barracks, all the women came out of their houses with torn clothes, crying, except her! She exited her house with the soldier's head in her hands. Her look was full of pride, and she said, ‘Did you think I would let him rape me without killing him or him killing me?’ The women in the village looked at each other and decided that she should be killed so that their husbands would not ask them why they did not resist like her! She was attacked and murdered. They murdered Honour so that shame could live.”

Perhaps this is why Bisi Fayemi, former First Lady of Ekiti State, condemned former senators Florence Ita-Giwa and Biodun Olujimi and serving senator Ireti Kingibe for not supporting Natasha. “Senator Kingibe, Olujimi, and Ita-Giwa's submissions on Senator Natasha are very disappointing,” she said.

There was a senator who even dragged the name of his former governor into the fray to score a point and perhaps look good in the SP's books, but his governor punctured his balloon; we have not heard from him since.

Most senators behaved like conspiring vultures circling over a kill to take their share of the flesh!

Beyond all this, one can see why women, the beautiful and the not-so-beautiful ones, are sceptical of joining politics, and why husbands, the good and even the not-so-good ones, are afraid to let their wives associate with politicians.

Natasha’s travail reveals that the opposition in Nigeria, whose vibrancy should be seen in the legislative house, is dying, if not dead. No senator from other parties was seen standing by her. It was a day when supposed vibrant senators went MIA (Missing in Action). And that is how they will each be picked, pecked, heckled, and cowered into a state of “Sidon look.”

The opposition, or probably all Senators, should read the story of the rat who called a meeting of farm animals in panic and told them that the farmer had set a rat trap. The pigeon, chicken, goat, and cow all “sympathised” with him but insisted it was his problem since they were not rats. The story ended tragically for them, minus the rat.

Natasha’s story is a lesson for all, not only politicians. Learn to fight your battles discreetly and gather enough facts. The moment your opponent not only deciphers but sees where you are going, you are a goner.

** Hassan Gimba, anipr, is the CEO/Publisher of Neptune Prime.

Police in Tennessee, United States, are looking for a crew of crooks who made off with $400 worth of cannabis oil from a local gas station convenience store — while armed with a menacing pair of pythons.

Surveillance footage released by the Madison County Sheriff’s Office shows the thieves at a truck stop on Highway 138 in Denmark, with one holding one of the snakes near the clerk at the counter, according to a new report by WREG-TV News.

One witness told the outlet it was a frightening experience.

“They were just waving them around and putting them on the counter,” store customer Mayur Raval said. “One person brought in one snake first, and then after that he brought in another snake. One is white and one is brown or a mix.

“They pulled their car up to the front of the door,” Raval told WREG. “I think they planned to successfully come here and rob the store. The snake is a weapon, you know.”

The crooks then snatched the cannabis oil and took off, fleeing the scene in a small four-door sedan.

Oddly enough, it’s not the first robbery by snake in the Volunteer State.

Last year, 26-year-old Reginald Cook was charged with attempted robbery when he tried to rob a Memphis gas station with a 5-foot snake — only to find himself out-gunned, the outlet said.

The Shell station clerk pulled out a gun and called 911.

 

New York Post

In a move that has sparked widespread criticism and raised questions about democratic processes, both chambers of Nigeria’s National Assembly approved President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a six-month state of emergency in Rivers State through voice votes, bypassing the constitutional requirement of a two-thirds majority. The decision has fueled accusations that the National Assembly is acting as a rubber stamp for the executive, with many Nigerians expressing outrage over the lack of transparency and adherence to constitutional provisions.

Constitutional Breach and Lack of Transparency

Section 305(6)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution mandates that a state of emergency declared by the president must be approved by a two-thirds majority of all members of both the Senate and the House of Representatives. This would require 240 votes in the House and 73 in the Senate. However, during Thursday’s plenary sessions, both chambers opted for voice votes, making it impossible to verify whether the constitutional threshold was met.

The House of Representatives, presided over by Speaker Abbas Tajudeen, approved the emergency rule after a debate that saw lawmakers propose amendments to the declaration. Similarly, the Senate, led by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, conducted an 80-minute closed-door session before emerging to approve the measure via a voice vote. Neither chamber disclosed the actual number of lawmakers who supported the motion, leaving Nigerians in the dark about whether the required two-thirds majority was achieved.

Prominent Nigerians, including banker Atedo Peterside and activist Dele Farotimi, have condemned the use of voice votes for such a critical decision. Peterside stated on X (formerly Twitter), “A two-thirds majority cannot be achieved via a voice vote. Members voting for or against the resolution to ratify the President’s emergency actions must identify themselves and cast their votes individually.” Farotimi echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the vote must be clearly counted to ensure constitutional compliance.

Widespread Criticism and Accusations of Rubber-Stamping

The approval of the state of emergency has intensified concerns about the National Assembly’s independence, with many Nigerians accusing the legislature of being a mere rubber stamp for the executive. Critics argue that the rushed process and lack of transparency undermine democratic principles and set a dangerous precedent for federal overreach in state affairs.

The South-South Governors’ Forum has also weighed in, expressing concern that the political situation in Rivers State does not meet the constitutional criteria for declaring a state of emergency. In a statement signed by Bayelsa State Governor Douye Diri, the Forum emphasized that the crisis between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and the State House of Assembly should be resolved through legal and constitutional means, rather than executive intervention.

Details of the Emergency Rule

President Tinubu’s declaration suspends Governor Fubara, his deputy, Ngozi Odu, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas, a former Chief of Naval Staff, has been appointed as the sole administrator of the oil-rich state during this period.

The South-South Governors' Forum has expressed deep concern over the recent declaration of a six-month state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu, calling into question the constitutional basis for the decision and urging a return to dialogue and legal processes to resolve the ongoing political crisis.

In a strongly worded statement signed by Governor Douye Diri of Bayelsa State, who chairs the Forum, the governors acknowledged the President's constitutional duty to maintain law and order across Nigeria. However, they argued that the current political situation in Rivers State does not meet the threshold for declaring a state of emergency as outlined in Section 305(3) of the Nigerian Constitution.

The Constitution stipulates that a state of emergency may be declared under specific conditions, such as war, external aggression, imminent invasion, breakdown of public order, existential threats to the nation, natural disasters, or other significant public dangers. The Forum emphasized that the political disputes between the Rivers State Governor and the State House of Assembly do not align with these criteria.

The governors also raised concerns about the suspension of democratic institutions in Rivers State, noting that the Constitution provides clear procedures for the removal of a governor, deputy governor, or members of the State House of Assembly under Section 188. They suggested that these constitutional guidelines may not have been fully considered in the current situation.

"The political disputes in Rivers State should ideally be resolved through legal and constitutional means, rather than by executive fiat," the statement read.

A Call for Rescission and Dialogue

The Forum proposed the rescission of the state of emergency as a critical step toward reducing tensions and establishing a foundation for lasting peace. They urged all parties involved to remain calm, uphold peace, and adhere to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

"The moment for dialogue is now," the statement emphasized, underscoring the need for constructive engagement to resolve the crisis.

The statement concluded with a reaffirmation of the Forum's commitment to securing peace and stability in the South-South region, while urging the Federal Government to reconsider its approach to the crisis in Rivers State.

A coalition of prominent political leaders, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, has condemned President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, calling it an unconstitutional overreach and a dangerous precedent for Nigeria’s democracy. The coalition also accused the National Assembly of fraudulently approving the emergency declaration by bypassing the constitutional requirement of a two-thirds majority vote.

At a press conference on Thursday, Atiku, flanked by El-Rufai, Labour Party spokesperson Yunusa Tanko, and former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Emeka Ihedioha, described Tinubu’s actions as illegal and a blatant violation of the 1999 Constitution. The coalition urged the judiciary to swiftly strike down the emergency declaration and called on Nigerians, civil society organizations, and political groups to reject the move.

Constitutional Violations and Fraudulent Approval

Atiku emphasized that Section 305 of the Constitution allows the president to declare a state of emergency only under extreme conditions, such as threats to public safety, national security, or Nigeria’s sovereignty. He argued that the political crisis in Rivers State, which pits Governor Siminalayi Fubara against his predecessor Nyesom Wike, does not meet these criteria.

“This action is not only unlawful but also a clear subversion of democracy and imposition of autocratic federal control over a duly elected state government,” Atiku stated. “Even if an emergency declaration were valid—which it is not—it would still require a two-thirds majority approval of all members of the National Assembly. If this approval is not secured, the proclamation must automatically cease to have effect.”

The coalition accused the National Assembly of failing to uphold its constitutional duty by approving the emergency declaration through voice votes rather than a transparent, counted vote. Section 305(6)(b) of the Constitution mandates that such a declaration must be supported by at least 240 members of the House of Representatives and 73 senators. However, both chambers opted for voice votes, making it impossible to verify whether the required majority was achieved.

“The National Assembly’s approval of this declaration is fraudulent and undermines the rule of law,” Atiku said. “By resorting to voice votes, they have denied Nigerians the transparency and accountability required in such a critical decision.”

A Dangerous Precedent

The coalition warned that Tinubu’s actions set a dangerous precedent that could be used to arbitrarily remove any governor or dismantle democratic structures in the future. They called on Nigerians to resist what they described as a brazen assault on the Constitution and the institutions of democracy.

“We strongly condemn this development and call on all Nigerians of good conscience to resist this brazen assault on the constitution of our country and the institutions of our democracy,” Atiku declared.

Background of the Crisis

On Tuesday, President Tinubu declared a six-month state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly. He appointed retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Étè Ibas, a former Chief of Naval Staff, as the sole administrator of the state.

Tinubu cited “disturbing” violence in the state, including explosions and the vandalization of petroleum pipelines, as the basis for his decision. However, critics argue that the crisis is primarily a political dispute between Fubara and Wike, and does not justify the suspension of democratic institutions.

Calls for Judicial Intervention and National Resistance

The coalition urged the judiciary to act swiftly to nullify the emergency declaration and restore constitutional order in Rivers State. They also called on civil society organizations, political groups, and all Nigerians to reject the move and defend democracy.

“This is not just about Rivers State; this is about the future of our democracy,” El-Rufai said. “If we allow this to stand, no governor or elected official will be safe from arbitrary removal by the federal government.”

Nigerian port operators and shipping companies are expressing growing concern over declining cargo volumes, even as significant investments pour into port infrastructure development across the country.

Despite more than $10 billion being invested by state governments and private sector entities into new deep and river seaports, industry stakeholders report troubling downward trends in shipping metrics. Vessel calls to Nigerian ports decreased by 4.5% in 2023, dropping to 3,778 from 3,957 in 2022. Additionally, cargo throughput (excluding crude oil) fell by 6.4%, with totals declining from 75.27 million metric tons in 2022 to 70.47 million metric tons in 2023.

At a recent Lagos press conference, Boma Alabi, chairman of the Shipping Agencies, Clearing and Forwarding Employers Association (SACFEA), highlighted several factors undermining Nigeria's port competitiveness. She pointed to increased port charges, naira depreciation, foreign exchange instability, and volatile clearing rates as key contributors to the industry's challenges.

Alabi emphasized that Nigeria is losing cargo traffic to neighboring countries with more competitive pricing structures. "Nigerian ports have become uncompetitive because of the numerous charges customers must pay compared to neighboring ports like Cotonou and Lome, which collect relatively low fees," she stated.

The SACFEA chairman urged government intervention, specifically calling for an end to the dollarization of the economy and the removal of recent fee increases. "The 15% increment in shipping charges represents a triple increase on what we used to pay. Just as the Customs 4% was suspended, please help us remove this increase. We are pleading," Alabi said.

Industry experts worry that without addressing these cost and currency issues, both established and newly developed Nigerian ports may struggle to remain viable in the increasingly competitive regional shipping landscape.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The growing wave of insecurity in Nigeria continued early Wednesday as gunmen attacked a Hiace bus traveling from Abuja to Lagos along Obajana Road in Kogi State, abducting four passengers and injuring two others.

Police confirmed that the attack occurred around 1:20 a.m. on March 19, 2025, at Gada Biyu. According to intelligence sources, the gunmen ambushed the bus (Reg. No. FGG 21 XS) carrying 17 passengers. The assailants shot the driver and a passenger before forcing four individuals, including security personnel from the Border Patrol Unit, into the bush. A police inspector on board managed to escape unhurt.

The injured victims were taken to the Federal Medical Centre in Lokoja for treatment.

A Nation Under Siege

This latest attack in Kogi underscores Nigeria’s deepening security crisis, where highways, farmlands, and communities have become hotspots for criminal activities. Across the country, armed groups, including kidnappers, bandits, and insurgents, continue to operate with alarming impunity, targeting travelers, students, and rural dwellers.

Freed Israeli hostage tells UN, 'No more excuses,' says aid is feeding terrorists

Former Hamas hostage Eli Sharabi went before the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) with his heartbreaking story and a simple plea: "Bring them all home now."

Sharabi has been free for less than six weeks, but in that time, he has already advocated for the hostages and spoken with world leaders about the plight of those still languishing in Hamas’ hands.

"On Oct. 7, my heaven turned to hell," Sharabi, who was taken from Kibbutz Be’eri, recalled. "Sirens began, Hamas terrorists invaded and I was ripped away from my family, never to see them again."

Kibbutz Be’eri saw some of the worst of the Oct. 7 massacre. More than 100 of its residents were murdered, and 30 were taken hostage during the attacks, according to the Israel Defense Forces. Among those killed were Sharabi’s wife and two daughters. He only learned of their murders when he returned from Gaza.

"Then I arrived home. They told me my mother and sister were waiting for me. I said, ‘Get me my wife and daughters.’ And that was when I knew. They were gone. They had been murdered," Sharabi told the council. Sharabi’s brother, Yossi, was also taken hostage but was killed in captivity. His body is still in Gaza.

When Sharabi was released Feb. 8 alongside Or Levy and Ohad Ben Ami, the world noticed that all three men looked gaunt. At the time, Israeli President Isaac Herzog said it was "what a crime against humanity looks like." President Donald Trump said the men "looked like Holocaust survivors" and seemed to be "in horrible condition."

Sharabi told the council that when he got back to Israel after spending 491 days in Hamas captivity, he weighed just 44 kilograms (97 pounds). He spoke about the pain of starvation and how, through the beatings — including one so severe his ribs were broken — he was consumed by hunger.

Sharabi testified that he was only given a pita a day and would be forced to beg for extra food. That was when he told the council where the U.N. humanitarian aid was going.

"I know that you discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza very often. But let me tell you, as an eyewitness, I saw what happened to that aid. Hamas stole it," Sharabi said. "I saw Hamas terrorists carrying boxes with the U.N. and UNRWA emblems on them into the tunnel. Dozens and dozens of boxes, paid by your governments, feeding terrorists who tortured me and murdered my family."

Many hostages who have returned say Hamas would eat in front of them as torture, never giving any food to the captives.

"When you speak of humanitarian aid, remember this: Hamas eats like kings while hostages starve. Hamas steals from civilians. Hamas blocks aid from reaching those who truly need it," Sharabi told the council.

Sharabi also slammed the U.N., the Red Cross and the world for their silence and inaction. 

"Where was the United Nations? Where was the Red Cross? Where was the world?" he asked.

Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon echoed this point, saying the security council "erased the hostages" and failed to mention "the humanitarian crimes Hamas is deliberately inflicting on the hostages." Danon then accused the "entire U.N. system" of abandoning its responsibility and the hostages.

Danon emphasized the war would not end until the remaining hostages were returned home.

Sharabi concluded his remarks with one demand.

"Bring them all home. No more excuses. No more delays. If you stand for humanity — prove it. Bring them home," he said.

 

Fox News

April 03, 2025

Oil prices sink after Trump announced sweeping new tariffs

Oil prices dropped $2 on Thursday after U.S. President Donald Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on…
April 02, 2025

Natasha outsmarts Kogi govt, Police; ‘drops’ from sky to jubilant crowds

In a spectacular display of defiance, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan turned the Kogi State Government and…
March 30, 2025

Does wearing a cap make you go bald? Here’s what dermatologists want you to know about hair loss

Hair loss can be an upsetting and worrisome experience. But with a slew of wellness…
March 30, 2025

Two 'proof of heaven' stories and one 'proof of hell' that had atheist calling out…

Ole Braatelien What happens to our consciousness the moment we die? Christians believe our souls…
April 02, 2025

Ponzi schemes: New law slams 10-year jail term, N40m fine - SEC

Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finally declared war on Ponzi schemes, with a…
April 03, 2025

What to know after Day 1134 of Russia-Ukraine war

WESTERN PERSPECTIVE Putin conscripts 160K men as Russia eyes Ukraine offensive Russia has initiated its…
March 28, 2025

Bill Gates: Within 10 years, AI will replace many doctors and teachers—humans won’t be needed…

Tom Huddleston Jr. Over the next decade, advances in artificial intelligence will mean that humans…
January 08, 2025

NFF appoints new Super Eagles head coach

The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has appointed Éric Sékou Chelle as the new Head Coach…

NEWSSCROLL TEAM: 'Sina Kawonise: Publisher/Editor-in-Chief; Afolabi Ajibola: IT Manager;
Contact Us: [email protected] Tel/WhatsApp: +234 811 395 4049

Copyright © 2015 - 2025 NewsScroll. All rights reserved.